| Posted: Wed Sep 23rd, 2009 07:37 pm |
|
61st Post |
serpentfoot
back to top
|
Spice wrote: serpentfoot wrote:
Did you see that cartoon in today's Rome News Tribune (and previous story) about "Man arrested for driving nude"?
SO WHAT IS WRONG WITH DRIVING NUDE? IBut no one can see his "forbidden [to show]" part when he is sitting in a car. So why did he get arrested for "driving nude" ???????????????????
Evidently, you did not actually read the article:
Authorities say a Georgia man was driving naked on the highway in Flagler County, where he repeatedly flashed a woman and her 11-year-old son.
The lady was a truck driver and had her son with her. The man followed them and continued exposing himself to them for about 8 miles until they were able to get off the expressway at a weigh station.
My opinion:
When someone drives nude: It is usually because they want to be seen, other wise, there are places that they can be nude without exposing others to their nudity.
The fact that some people have no problem with nudity does not mean that everyone should feel the same way or that they would want their children exposed to some ones nudity. Frankly, most people look better with clothes on.
Spice, you may be right, I sort of glanced over the original article without checking it too closely. I did not write about it until I saw it again under a headline like "Man arrested for driving nude"
If she was driving a truck (especially if it was a BIG truck, I don't see how she and her child could have seen the man's nude lower parts flashing if he was FOLLOWING her. If she slowed that big rig down to let him come up beside her surely she could have looked down to see what was sitting on his car seat, but her 11 year old child was probably in the far right passenger seat, so it must have been the woman doing the most looking? If he was following her, why did she slow down, to let him come up beside her? So she could get a better look? And if she could not get rid of him any other way, she could have nudged him a bit with that big rig, and would have had a good excuse that she was "SHOCKED" into the collision by his "flashing nudity".
Instead it seems the woman took too much time checking out what was in the man's car or hanging too close to it--so the child could check it out? Certainly the man did not have anything the boy didn't have but the woman should have told her 11 year old son to ignore and stay away from people (or any animal) "acting strange", especially if he is doing it on a highway.
It sounds like both drivers needed to be arrested for "reckless driving", not keeping their eyes on the road, "child endangerment" in hanging around someone recklessly flashing on a highway, not the "man arrested for nude driving". Of course I may still be missing something else, and we can all come up with different opinions. Please let me know if the situation was different than I see it. Thanks.
Last edited on Wed Sep 23rd, 2009 07:57 pm by serpentfoot
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 23rd, 2009 08:34 pm |
|
62nd Post |
serpentfoot
back to top
|
BrandonLang18 wrote: serpentfoot wrote:
But if you'd rather forget suits for a bit and test your self control while looking at those women in Man's First Clothes [the mud bath] click here. Thanks:
Hey mods,
Might be out on a limb again with this, but what happened to the rule about posting gross stuff (nudity, porn, gross stuff, and the like)? I think this link would qualify as disgusting and downright puzzling to be honest! Ridiculous
Brandon, what are you talking about PORN? The ladies in that mud bath may be a tiny bit "ugly" to you, You might call it "gross", especially if you are a young fellow devoted to teenage girl images, but those ladies in the mud are NOT PORN images! They are every bit as covered up as ballet dancers. That link is to an article posted on the cultural Georgia Highlands website where no one has objected to it in the several years.
The fattest lady, the one you might think most "gross" is also a "spitting image' of THE ANCIENT FERTILITY GODDESS, THE DUCHESS OF WILLENDORF". The Art Professor at Georgia Highlands College, Brian Barr, did his version of that for me, using my photos of the ladies, which work is also posted on that site and shown in the link.
You seem like an intelligent fellow and with some appreciation for art--I really like the crowd you posted in--but do not call something porn merely because that substance covering the ladies is not "clothes", mud not cotton, nylon or wool (which eventually disintegrates into dust and mud) nor call the ladies images gross because they do not fit your idea of the ideal.
Last edited on Thu Sep 24th, 2009 07:34 pm by serpentfoot
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 23rd, 2009 08:51 pm |
|
63rd Post |
serpentfoot
back to top
|
Spice wrote: Serpentfoot,
I believe Brandonlang has a point here:
One of the forum rules:
Do not post porn or gross stuff. This includes avatars.
What some may consider Art or natural, others may not so I am going to remove the link at this time. If you feel that I have removed it in error, please talk with the forum administrator and he can make a final decision to either leave it deleted or allow you to repost it.
Thanks
spice
Spice, Please do not be narrow minded. I'll tell you the same thing I told Brandon:
Brandon, what are you talking about PORN? The ladies in that mud bath may be a tiny bit "ugly" to you, You might call it "gross", especially if you are a young fellow devoted to teenage girl images, but those ladies in the mud are NOT PORN images! They are every bit as covered up as ballet dancers. That link is to an article posted on the cultural Georgia Highlands website where no one has objected to it in the several years.
The fattest lady, the one you might think most "gross" is also a "spitting image' of THE ANCIENT FERTILITY GODDESS, THE DUCHESS OF WILLENDORF". The Art Professor at Georgia, Brian Barr did his version of that for me, using my photos of the ladies, which work is also posted on that site and shown in the link.
You seem like an intelligent fellow and with some appreciation for art--I really like the crowd you posted in--but do not call something porn merely because that substance covering the ladies is not "clothes", mud not cotton, nylon or wool (which eventually disintegrates into dust and mud) nor call the ladies images gross because they do not fit your idea of the ideal.
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 23rd, 2009 08:57 pm |
|
64th Post |
Spice
Super Moderator
back to top
|
serpentfoot wrote: Spice wrote: Serpentfoot,
I believe Brandonlang has a point here:
One of the forum rules:
Do not post porn or gross stuff. This includes avatars.
What some may consider Art or natural, others may not so I am going to remove the link at this time. If you feel that I have removed it in error, please talk with the forum administrator and he can make a final decision to either leave it deleted or allow you to repost it.
Thanks
spice
Spice, Please do not be narrow minded. I'll tell you the same thing I told Brandon:
Brandon, what are you talking about PORN? The ladies in that mud bath may be a tiny bit "ugly" to you, You might call it "gross", especially if you are a young fellow devoted to teenage girl images, but those ladies in the mud are NOT PORN images! They are every bit as covered up as ballet dancers. That link is to an article posted on the cultural Georgia Highlands website where no one has objected to it in the several years.
The fattest lady, the one you might think most "gross" is also a "spitting image' of THE ANCIENT FERTILITY GODDESS, THE DUCHESS OF WILLENDORF". The Art Professor at Georgia, Brian Barr did his version of that for me, using my photos of the ladies, which work is also posted on that site and shown in the link.
You seem like an intelligent fellow and with some appreciation for art--I really like the crowd you posted in--but do not call something porn merely because that substance covering the ladies is not "clothes", mud not cotton, nylon or wool (which eventually disintegrates into dust and mud) nor call the ladies images gross because they do not fit your idea of the ideal.
Serpentfoot, I am not "narrow minded", I am trying to follow the forum rules that were set up because there are children who also look at the forum. I have studied art and understand what the classics are, however, as I said, I am following the rules, not my own preferences, what ever they may be.
As I suggested, you may talk to the administrator and he may decide that you should be allowed to post the link.
____________________
“War does not determine who is right - only who is left” Bertrand Russell
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 23rd, 2009 09:20 pm |
|
65th Post |
BrandonLang18
Member
back to top
|
Serpent,
Its not porn. I agree. I didn't say it was. I called it gross, which it is. Fat, thin, small, big, pink, purple... doesn't matter. Women in mud is not something that gets me going. It was a clear violation of the rules however. And, just because I am young doesn't mean that I have to be devoted to teenage girl images. Who is being narrow minded by posting that statement? I happen to be super attracted to a hot mother of 1, my wife. And you know what, she isn't a teenager. I would not assume things and make snap judgments if I were you, given your prior track record.
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 23rd, 2009 09:45 pm |
|
66th Post |
romegasir
Troglodyte
back to top
|
quit calling out serpent foot trying to get her posts deleted, banned or whatever..........................sheesh, are we REALLY going to ban "gross" stuff............................that's ridiculous...........................................
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 23rd, 2009 09:55 pm |
|
67th Post |
TheShadow
"Born Free… Taxed to De
back to top
|
I agree RGS. I have seen things on here that I didn't agree with but didn't call for a deletion. Who decides what the definition on "gross" is? Porn or obscene is one thing but gross? That leaves a whole can of worms open when you try to figure what is gross.
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 23rd, 2009 09:58 pm |
|
68th Post |
Wild H Woman
back to top
|
BrandonLang18 wrote: serpentfoot wrote: BrandonLang18 wrote: serpentfoot wrote: I still haven't heard a word from the City and the county and the paper hasn't had a word about them even considering the 30 day notice I sent them back September 9, 2009, so I figure they have no intention of even considering what is the right thing to do UNLESS I'M GOOD ENOUGH TO GET A COURT TO COERCE THEM TO DO THE RIGHT THING. I am getting better, I think, and hope to attract some attorney who is the very best. Any of you who know somebody good who wants to "make a name" for themselves, and to get a 40 % commission of all the millions for damages they get for me, please have them contact me. Thanks.
Ps: Tell them they can find the whole story right here and send them this link:
http://www.rnwforum.com/reply.php?topic_id=6186
Party at my house when Foot gets her "Millions". 
Brandon that is WONDERFUL! And thanks for the invitation! I really do like that and I'm looking forward to just such a celebration, briefly of course, we all like a plenty of seclusion too. But every time I see a picture of penguins or other such groups it reminds me of our human settlements too in places like New York or San Francisco or Miami. Penguins could not be more congregated or happy on a shoreline than that crowd shown above. Thanks!
Do you live at 44 Alabama St. in Cave Spring by chance?
Why... what's suppose to be at that specific address?
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 23rd, 2009 10:02 pm |
|
69th Post |
Wild H Woman
back to top
|
BrandonLang18 wrote: Serpent,
Its not porn. I agree. I didn't say it was. I called it gross, which it is. Fat, thin, small, big, pink, purple... doesn't matter. Women in mud is not something that gets me going. It was a clear violation of the rules however. And, just because I am young doesn't mean that I have to be devoted to teenage girl images. Who is being narrow minded by posting that statement? I happen to be super attracted to a hot mother of 1, my wife. And you know what, she isn't a teenager. I would not assume things and make snap judgments if I were you, given your prior track record.
Now, now, Brandon, it wasn't all that long ago that you were asking about working security detail at GGW... 
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 23rd, 2009 10:55 pm |
|
70th Post |
toosavoter
back to top
|
Don't get serpentfoot upset...she might drop her drawers again...
____________________
Text REDCROSS to 90999 to donate $10 to the Red Cross Nashville Flood Relief fund.
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 23rd, 2009 10:58 pm |
|
71st Post |
| Posted: Thu Sep 24th, 2009 12:18 am |
|
72nd Post |
BrandonLang18
Member
back to top
|
romegasir wrote: quit calling out serpent foot trying to get her posts deleted, banned or whatever..........................sheesh, are we REALLY going to ban "gross" stuff............................that's ridiculous...........................................
No offense to you, but whats right is right. If one were to get in trouble by mods for something like this or anything else, doesn't it stand to reason that everyone should have to abide by the same rules? Why does she get a pass just because she is different?
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 24th, 2009 12:19 am |
|
73rd Post |
BrandonLang18
Member
back to top
|
Wild H Woman wrote: BrandonLang18 wrote: Serpent,
Its not porn. I agree. I didn't say it was. I called it gross, which it is. Fat, thin, small, big, pink, purple... doesn't matter. Women in mud is not something that gets me going. It was a clear violation of the rules however. And, just because I am young doesn't mean that I have to be devoted to teenage girl images. Who is being narrow minded by posting that statement? I happen to be super attracted to a hot mother of 1, my wife. And you know what, she isn't a teenager. I would not assume things and make snap judgments if I were you, given your prior track record.
Now, now, Brandon, it wasn't all that long ago that you were asking about working security detail at GGW...
True, and that fits in how? I made the comment that it was a poor attempt at humor... I wouldnt really go. I want to stay in my house and continue to have everyday visits with my son. lol
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 24th, 2009 03:20 am |
|
74th Post |
romegasir
Troglodyte
back to top
|
BrandonLang18 wrote: romegasir wrote: quit calling out serpent foot trying to get her posts deleted, banned or whatever..........................sheesh, are we REALLY going to ban "gross" stuff............................that's ridiculous...........................................
No offense to you, but whats right is right. If one were to get in trouble by mods for something like this or anything else, doesn't it stand to reason that everyone should have to abide by the same rules? Why does she get a pass just because she is different?
I always ask that the mods don't censor anyone, even when they insult me personally..............................................................done it several times and I ALWAYS ask the mods to let 'em be...........................................................................................
We really don't want this site to become akin to a debate on the House of Rep floor........................................................................................................................suck it up and let serpentfoot post what she wants to post.............................................you would have never asked for her "gross" post to be deleted, had she been in agreement with you.......................................................
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 24th, 2009 03:33 am |
|
75th Post |
Spice
Super Moderator
back to top
|
I promise I will try (I say try because if you get really nasty I get out the peanut butter), to stay out of this one. I have already been chewed out once today and no matter how fair I try to be, I will always end up offending someone.
I think I will go make myself a peanut butter sandwich! 
____________________
“War does not determine who is right - only who is left” Bertrand Russell
|
| Current time is 09:44 am | Page:   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...   |
|
