| Posted: Wed Jan 27th, 2010 09:21 pm |
|
1st Post |
serpentfoot

back to top
|
In my response to the motion to dismiss of "The Honorable Judge Robert Durham and District Attorney Leigh Patterson" [now also joined by new defendant Judge F. Larry Salmon] I not only pointed out that the wrong Judge Durham is Making the motion--while the actual defendant, "Judge J. Bryant Durham", is also making a footnote statement that they do not concede they were properly served, but:
In addition to asking the Court to rule that the actual defendant is Judge J. Bryant Durham, and that he and the other defendants have been sufficiently served with summons and Complaint in this case and that their several motions waive any such defenses for service of papers, but also:
I also asked the Court to rule that Defendants are sufficiently notified that they may have a conflict of interest with their present attorney (Georgia's Attorney General Thurbert Baker) as my response referred to an Exhibit that had already been served on them, showing how Roy Barnes helped Rome and Floyd County get away with the first SPLOST fraud. This is a link to the Exhibit:
http://www.highlands.edu/webzine/backbytes/features18/serpentfoot.htm
And if defendants can't make a deal with Baker to help them as much as Mr. Barnes did (covering up the fraud--that the Forum and New Courthouse were not even on the ballot of 1988) and arguing with Rome's attorneys only over WHERE to build the Forum (or who was going to make the money on the project.) Defendants may be very unhappy.
If it turns out that Thurbert Baker is honest and dues his public duty to expose the present and previous SPLOST frauds, or if he does so for the political advantage he can gain by showing how dishonest Roy Barnes was in helping defendants get away with that 1988 Forum fraud, in the 1991 court cases, the defendants are going to try to escape the court's judgement by appealing on the basis that they "did not know their attorney, Baker (and maybe their previous attorney Barnes?) had a conflict of interest with them."
To foreclose that possibility, I asked the Court to rule that they are sufficiently notified and that if they continue with their attorney, they waive any claim about conflict of interest--in case Thurbert Baker does not go along with their frauds like Roy Barnes did.
Last edited on Wed Jan 27th, 2010 09:25 pm by serpentfoot
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 27th, 2010 11:56 pm |
|
2nd Post |
TheShadow
"Born Free… Taxed to De

back to top
|
Hell, sue Roy Barnes too!!! Let's not leave anyone out of this fiasco.
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 28th, 2010 03:43 pm |
|
3rd Post |
ManinBlack
Guest
back to top
|
One thing is for d**n sure "If we ever had a Governor who needed to be sued, Roy Barnes is first on the list"He caused a lot of heartache with his political agendas. Caused our State Sentor at the time to lose a job he cherished, a job he was really good at by making him vote for his Flag program. Barnes was also the Power Man who got Dave Pimper (local Stock Broker) run out of town on a rail. Pimper was later vindicated in our local courts, but only after being gutted financially by Bob Finnell and his Judge Colston. That will fly back in someone's face is my prediction.
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 4th, 2010 08:27 pm |
|
4th Post |
serpentfoot

back to top
|
TheShadow wrote: Hell, sue Roy Barnes too!!! Let's not leave anyone out of this fiasco.
Like Maninblack just said, Roy Barnes does need to be sued, but with 24 defendants in my case already I have been really pushed fighting all their motions to dismiss and it has been especialy hard as they are either very sneaky or maybe just incompetent or both. And even if it is only their messing up, it creates terrible difficulties. For instance:
When Judge Salmon's attorney filed his motion to dismiss my case, he put the wrong p.o. Box number to the right of the zip code so it was put in the wrong box. Nine days later the person who saw it was not theirs evidently gave it back to the postal clerks who corrected the box number and I got it the next day--10 days after it was filed. That robbed me of 10 of the days I needed to file a good response and I barely made the deadline.
The same attorneys (The Georgia Attorney General's Office) had previously filed a motion to dismiss for D. A. Leigh Patterson and Judge J. Bryant Durham--whom they listed as "The Honorable Judge Robert Durham", with a footnote from J. Bryant Durham claiming the defendants therein did not concede service. That confusion was also adopted for Judge Salmon's motion. So I had to again show that the correctly nameJudge J. Bryant Durham et al, NOT Judge Robert Durham were served.
Likewise the City of Rome robbed me of a week that I could have spent answering their first motion to dismiss, which they did not serve me at all until I discovered (from the clerk of court) that they had filed the motion and went to their office to recover get a copy.
So even though the 24 defendants have only 4 attorneys (or 4 lawfirms) that's more than enough to keep me busy--why I have not been here more lately. Thanks.
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 05:40 pm |
|
5th Post |
serpentfoot

back to top
|
Rome is determined to destroy the graves of some of my Scot/Cherokee kin on the Chief John Ross archeological site. They know the graves are there--they unmarked them--just as they destroyed the home. How can one city be so dishonest and corrupt as to talk about "HISTORIC ROME" but deliberately ignore our most historic spot? That is racism for you, and they hate the Native Americans as much as they do the blacks--though they have token blacks on the city and county commissions, and a token Native American in the Ridge home "Chieftains" (a lie too because he was not the chief, but Rome likes him because he forged the treaty to throw all Indians out of here). Last edited on Mon Feb 8th, 2010 05:42 pm by serpentfoot
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 07:49 pm |
|
6th Post |
| Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 08:15 pm |
|
7th Post |
jesse jackson

back to top
|
coolhead, do you know who the indian is that S/Foot is talking about.......it could have an impact on the history of Rome. As is their custom, Rome does not have much respect for some historical places. Fort Norton for example...not much there now, but it was important when it defended Rome during the Civil War.
Do you remember when a city employee took down the Historical Marker on Martha Berry and took to the Maint. shed? It got put back after some discussion, but was put back in a different location....progress.
____________________ Everything that you say or do is okay with a liberal...until they disagree with you!
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 8th, 2010 10:14 pm |
|
8th Post |
coolhead64

back to top
|
oh yea, serpentfoots great great scottish nephew, John Ross, Who is buried nowhere near Rome, as he is actually buried in Park Hill, Oklahoma.
____________________ Write in Eric Loveland for County Commissioner 2010.
Show the commish they are not invincible.
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 9th, 2010 02:06 am |
|
9th Post |
jesse jackson

back to top
|
You are so cool and so smart......do you still wet the bed?
____________________ Everything that you say or do is okay with a liberal...until they disagree with you!
|
coolhead64

back to top
|
jesse jackson wrote:
You are so cool and so smart......do you still wet the bed?
umm, ok, more confusion by facts I see.
Or do you want me to say something like I know you are but what am I?
I mean seriously, you talk about me being a kid but then you turn around and post something like that, real good debating skills, if we can't come up with something to say, let's just make fun of the other person, that's classic.
____________________ Write in Eric Loveland for County Commissioner 2010.
Show the commish they are not invincible.
|
jesse jackson

back to top
|
Sorry cool, that was out of line. Please accept my apology.
____________________ Everything that you say or do is okay with a liberal...until they disagree with you!
|
Spice
Super Moderator

back to top
|
coolhead64 wrote: oh yea, serpentfoots great great scottish nephew, John Ross, Who is buried nowhere near Rome, as he is actually buried in Park Hill, Oklahoma.
I don't believe Serpentfoot ever said Chief John Ross was buried in Rome. It is his family members who are buried here.
____________________ “War does not determine who is right - only who is left” Bertrand Russell
|
ManinBlack
Guest
back to top
|
John Ross was lucky, He was not murdered here in Rome. He was kicked out of Rome by Federal troops at the direction of his most esteemed friend. Ex-General then President Andrew Jackson. He, and family members fought at Jackson's side for many years but in the end Jackson took the bribes and had them all removed to Oklahoma.
Now to the murder of Chief John Ross, He was murdered by his own people and family members in Oklahoma. They did not like the fact that he continued to believe that the Great White Leader was honest. He is buried in Oklahoma, but not Spring Hill.
|
coolhead64

back to top
|
ManinBlack wrote: John Ross was lucky, He was not murdered here in Rome. He was kicked out of Rome by Federal troops at the direction of his most esteemed friend. Ex-General then President Andrew Jackson. He, and family members fought at Jackson's side for many years but in the end Jackson took the bribes and had them all removed to Oklahoma.
Now to the murder of Chief John Ross, He was murdered by his own people and family members in Oklahoma. They did not like the fact that he continued to believe that the Great White Leader was honest. He is buried in Oklahoma, but not Spring Hill.
Is it possible he is buried in Park Hill, like my original post says?
Or am I not allowed to be right anymore?
____________________ Write in Eric Loveland for County Commissioner 2010.
Show the commish they are not invincible.
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 10th, 2010 12:01 am |
|
15th Post |
| Current time is 07:50 am | Page: 1 2 |
|